By: Anum Shafique
When we think of bureaucratic culture, one term looms large in our minds: “Red Tapism.” It’s a phrase that encapsulates the intricate procedures within the public sector. Excessive bureaucracy and administrative procedures often become a hindrance, slowing down the efficient functioning of any organization. I experienced this firsthand when I became a part of one.
In the realm of public sector organizations, this bureaucratic web is a primary culprit for delayed decision-making. Days slip away as approvals are ensnared within mandatory channels. At times, these approvals come after the scheduled event or proposed activity date.
However, this issue is just the tip of the iceberg. There’s another facet to the story, one that showcases individuals who ardently embrace the system. These loyal adherents willingly abide by every intricate aspect of the process. They deserve our admiration for their unwavering commitment. In their presence, bypassing channels for quicker decision-making seems utterly impossible.
Every desk demands its due justification and undivided attention. They dissect the purpose of the file with a keen eye, sometimes adding their subjective biases as if their perspective alone defines what is right and wrong, even if they appear to be dwelling in a Utopian world.
This bureaucracy not only adds delays, a commonly understood frustration, but also inflicts a sense of trauma upon those genuinely seeking to do good. They begin searching for influential references to help expedite their work, resorting to negative means in some cases. Corruption is not a distant possibility in this scenario.
We can only hope that those in positions of authority come to realize the gravity of this issue and take the necessary actions to address this critical matter.
The writer is a freelance columnist. She can be reached at [email protected]
